Which language do we use in the higher dimensions? – What words do we speak? – The function of language in 3D/4D – How do we actually communicate in Higher Dimensions

There I tried my best to give an overall perspective on how dimensions have been mapped out throughout the ages and in different cosmological, metaphysical, and spiritual systems.

And how advanced quantum science and neuroscience come to astonishing discoveries that converge with age-old spiritual teachings.

But for now—instead of immediately looking into higher-dimensional communication, I would like to start very down-to-earth.

The languages that we speak – all 7159 of them that are presently considered living languages – are the tools of expression and description that we developed in order to communicate amongst each other.

And write books and such articles that – hopefully – will convey information and ideas and inspiration and meaning for all future generations to read. [ Kidding ; ]

Personally I love to use language in the very fluid and free-flowing way of poetry as well as in precise formulations when writing code or explaining something that interests me.
And kidding and everything in between.

I also love to listen to the funny and surprising ways that kids have with language, toddlers especially, when they formulate their thoughts and questions. Or simply express their feelings in verbal ways.

And I also love to know more about the findings of linguists and researchers of consciousness concerning the development of language in early humanity.

All of that and more I intend to cover shortly in Part One of this article. The down-to-earth stuff.

I owe a lot of my understanding to the work of linguists focused on early childhood development as well as the evolution of language in early humans.

The deepest insights come – as so often – from the work of Rudolf Steiner/Waldorf Pedagogy and Esoteric Anthroposophy and Theosophy.

Thank you guys&gals!

~
~~
~

listen ➡

Part One

How 3D Space Shapes Our Words

Before Words

The Womb as first encounter with language

In our world, language is sound, modulated sound waves, but it doesn’t begin with the first spoken word. It begins in darkness, in water, in the rhythmic pulsing of a mother’s heartbeat.

At 30 weeks after conception, sensory and brain mechanisms for hearing are already developed, and unborn babies spend the last 10 weeks of pregnancy listening to their mother’s talk.

The womb environment acts as a low-pass filter—individual speech sounds are suppressed, but the melody and rhythm of speech, as well as the emotions they convey, are preserved.

Before a single object has been named, before any concept of “I” or “you” exists, the fetus is already absorbing the musical architecture of language:

– Not words, but patterns. Not meaning, but rhythm.

– Not grammar, but the emotional tones that will later shape how grammar is used.

Some midwives say that “babies cry in the accent of their mother tongue” at birth.

That means that language acquisition begins with melody and rhythmic patterning—the pitch, intensity, and duration variations that give speech its musical quality.

The fetus isn’t learning what is being said but how saying happens in the particular frequency range of their native language.

This prenatal phase represents something like a communication before separation. The developing consciousness hasn’t yet crystallized into a distinct “self” separate from mother, separate from environment.

Information flows through direct physical resonance—vibrations in fluid, heartbeat rhythms, and the felt presence of voice as a bodily event rather than a conceptual message.

listen ➡

The Toddler’s Journey: From Unity to Duality

If we watch a one-year-old babble sounds and then slowly form words, we are witnessing the gradual construction of the subject-object split that language does in real-time.

The first three years of life, when the brain is developing and maturing, is the most intensive period for acquiring speech and language skills.

This isn’t just learning vocabulary—it’s the fundamental architecture of how reality is organized being installed in consciousness.

At 12-18 months, toddlers begin naming objects: “dog,” “cup,” “mama.” Simple nouns.

What’s really happening here is that the undifferentiated and unnamed field of direct experience is being carved into separate things. The flowing continuity of perception gets fixed into discrete objects that can be pointed at, labeled, possessed.

By 18-24 months, verbs appear, like “go,” “eat,” and “want.”

Now the toddler has agency—it is doing something. The sentence structure “me do it” or “mama go” establishes the fundamental pattern: actor-action-object. A subject operating in the world.

This is the early childhood grammatical template for dualistic experience.

By age three, full sentences with past tense emerge, something funny like: “I runned to the park.”
Children begin using grammar, structured sentences, plurals, and past tense.
In this way they are carving up the flow of experience into distinct time frames. Time itself becomes linear—yesterday, today, tomorrow.
The eternal present of infant consciousness fragments into past-present-future.

Language creates the experience of being a separate self moving through time, acting on objects, and navigating spatial relationships.

The toddler’s linguistic development mirrors the original human journey from unified awareness to individuated consciousness.

listen ➡

The Space-oriented Foundation of Grammar in Early Humans

Early human communication was all about gestures, and this gestural phase of language development left traces in the way concepts related to space – that evolution implemented in our brain’s hippocampus – provide organizing principles at the heart of grammar.

I can’t prove it, but that is what the linguists that work on early human language development say.

Our brains literally navigate language using the same neural architecture we used to find our way home to the cave, to the clan.

The essential difference of human thinking compared to animal cognition is found in unique abilities to share knowledge through communicative actions, gestures, spoken language, and material symbols that represent knowledge.

Language emerged as a coordination technology for beings moving through physical space together, hunting, gathering, building, warning each other of danger, and sharing information about food gathering and hunting.

.
The structure of our sentences reflects the structure of cause-and-effect in 3D reality:

• subject-verb-object: “I throw spear.”
-> Linear causation.

• grammatical system of tenses: past-present-future. “Mammoths are coming after snow.”
-> Time as a river flowing in one direction.

• Location-based orientation: in, on, under, behind, between. “Child under falling rocks.”
-> Defining relationships between objects in space.

~
~~
~

listen ➡

The Evolutionary Mirror

Rudolf Steiner’s View of
Language shaping Collective Consciousness

What happens in individual development may mirror what happened in the evolution of species.

Rudolf Steiner’s clairvoyant investigations into the Akashic Records described early humanity—particularly during the Lemurian and early Atlantean periods—as existing in a fundamentally different state of consciousness than modern humans.

According to Steiner, early Lemurian humanity lived in dreamlike consciousness, unable to connect sense perceptions with thoughts in the way we do. His soul expressed itself simply in instincts, desires, and animal drives—consciousness was dreamy, a kind of almost-stupor.

These early humans had not yet developed the individuated ego-consciousness that defines modern selfhood.

Steiner described early humans as living in semi-incarnated states, more connected to group soul consciousness than individual identity.
Memory as we know it didn’t exist. As long as man did not remember the past, there could be no explanation of experiences by means of speech. It was only in the Atlantean period that speech found its development, emerging alongside the faculty of personal memory.

This lack of memory and narration wasn’t just primitive ignorance. Early humanity possessed important abilities we have lost:

According to Steiner and other clairvoyant researchers of Akashic Records, early humans had:

– Direct clairvoyant perception of spiritual realities.
– Immediate connection to life forces in nature.
– Communication through field resonance rather than symbolic language.
– They experienced reality holographically—not as separate subjects observing separate objects, but as participants in unified consciousness.

The evolution from Lemuria through Atlantis to our current “individuated consciousness epoch” – that Steiner named the Aryan Epoch – represents the gradual descent into matter and the crystallization of separate selfhood.

Language developed as individual consciousness separated from unity and also because of it. We desperately needed to have words when we lost direct telepathic knowing.

The parallel to early childhood is actually quite obvious: Just as the fetus exists in a unified field with the mother before language, early humanity existed in a unified field with spiritual realms before “The Fall” into self-conscious separation.

And just as the toddler constructs subject-object duality through language acquisition, humanity constructed the dualistic consciousness that defines our 3D/4D reality.

We have built language(s) to bridge the gap created by our own individuation. Words became necessary when we forgot how to be in constant communion with the whole environment.

listen ➡

Language as Reality Constructor

Whether we’re witnessing a fetus becoming a child or Lemurian consciousness becoming modern ego, the pattern repeats:

Language doesn’t just describe reality—it constructs the experience of a particular kind of reality.

Some linguists propose the hypothesis that our thought processes often determine how we look at the world—our language restricts our thought processes, our language shapes our personal reality.

According to this linguistic theory, differences in language create differences in thought: “We see and hear and otherwise experience very largely as we do because the language habits of our community create a default worldview.

Language creates grooves, habits, and default assumptions about what’s real and how reality operates.

Western languages view time as a flowing river carrying us from past through present into future, with verb systems reflecting that concept through specific tenses.

A speaker of the Hopi language or the Aborigines languages has very different ideas “installed” by default—their language has no present, past, or future tense but instead divides the world into “manifested” and “unmanifest” domains. They live in the present moment because their language does not have past or future tenses.

Different linguistic architecture. Different experienced reality.

listen ➡

Source books about language development - download

Download

Download

Now, my real curiosity and interest is:

If 3D/4D language shapes 3D/4D consciousness… what happens when consciousness shifts into dimensions where our basic language foundations of subject-object, here-there, before-after no longer apply?

The short answer:

Higher dimensional Consciousness – Unity Consciousness – has a completely different way of “language” and communication altogether.

~
~~
~

listen ➡

Part Two

Communication in Unity Consciousness

The Fundamental Problem

“The Tao that can be spoken is not the eternal Tao.
The name that can be named is not the eternal name.

The nameless is the origin of Heaven and Earth.
The named is the mother of all things .….

Lao Tze

Mystical traditions across cultures have been aware of the paradox and developed elegant workarounds:

The Upanishads describe ultimate reality as “neti neti” (not this, not that).

Meister Eckhart’s “Godhead beyond God.”

The Tao Te Ching’s opening:

“The Tao that can be named is not the eternal Tao.”

They use language to point away from fixed expressions and warn of fixing reality into concepts.

Zen koans deliberately crash the subject-object operating system.

“What is the sound of one hand clapping?”

These aren’t riddles to solve but linguistic devices designed to exhaust the conceptual mind until a gap opens – and in that gap, direct knowing beyond words becomes possible.

But for the sake of our investigation here, I will still use good old 3D language and try to get more specific about what actually replaces dualistic language in higher dimensions.

listen ➡

Field Resonance in place of Information Transfer

Also known as Telepathy 👽

Morphic fields of coherent social groups connect together members even when they are many miles apart and provide channels of communication through which organisms can stay in touch at a distance. I am not only talking about the human species here.

Rupert Sheldrake‘s morphic resonance theory assumes as a fact that communication happens through field coherence rather than sequential information transmission.

In 3D/4D language, meaning is encoded by the speaker, then transmitted by way of sound or written text and then decoded by the receiver.

Like sending a letter.

But in field-based communication, awareness structures temporarily synchronize in a shared coherence pattern.

Information doesn’t travel—it arises within the unified field.

Sheldrake has been an early visionary scientist to discover and research this in various domains.

Telepathy most easily takes place between members of groups who share social or emotional bonds – morphic fields provide channels through which members can stay in touch even at a distance.

– Heart-centered telepathy as expressed in mystical literature
– The instant rapport between lovers or people very close to each other
– Quantum entanglement as information correlation
– In silent meditation and flow states, “knowing” occurs without a thinker

In all such cases the communication mechanism shifts from “I transmit information to you” (subject-object) to “awareness temporarily becomes unified field where knowing arises” (nondual).

listen ➡

Light Language

Geometry as Information Architecture

This is where it gets wildly interesting.

And otherworldly.

Handle with care! 🤣

Light codes are energetic transmissions that carry high-vibrational frequencies from higher dimensions, appearing as symbols, colors, sounds, or light, serving to activate DNA, expand consciousness, and align with the soul’s purpose.

Many channeled teachings transmitted from higher-dimensional sources (or maybe our own Higher Selves ; ) speak about that.

Multiple independent such sources describe forms of communication that transcend verbal-linear structure entirely.

Light Language is channeled healing that brings light codes through symbols, language, tapping, singing, art, body movement, and dancing – a language of vibration that includes sound healing and toning.

Light language represents the “singing” of streaming light in glyphs, writing, or spoken word that shapes itself geometrically and assists in DNA enhancement, healing, and accessing universal information – a language of feeling that emanates through the heart.

As you may see, I am really struggling to find the right 3D-words for something 5D or higher, but it is great fun to try!

Sacred geometry isn’t representing concepts – it is directly transmitting coherent information packages.

Like fractals that have the whole fractal encoded in every part of it or how a hologram contains the entire image in every fragment, geometric codes function as compact holographic containers.

listen ➡

Multisensory Holographic Encoding

Light Language can be seen by some as colors, symbols in the air, sacred geometry, codes, and frequencies – visual representation includes Light Codes channeled as healing symbols brought by higher dimensional beings.

Higher-dimensional communication operates simultaneously across multiple sensory channels:

Visual: Geometric patterns, color frequencies
Auditory: Harmonic tones, light language vocalizations
Kinesthetic: Energy sensations, spontaneous body movements
Gnostic: Direct knowing that bypasses sensory processing entirely

In simple words: It is not “I tell you something” but “we temporarily become a unified field sharing information holographically.”

~
~~
~

listen ➡

Part Three

The Translators

Channeling as an Interdimensional Interface

The Compression Problem of all the channeled teachings

– In his very patient way, Ra emphasized the difficulty of retaining a clear channel through instruments, experiencing interference of the channel’s persona and energy fluctuations of the audience’s focus .

– When Jane Roberts channeled Seth or Carla Rueckert channeled Ra, they weren’t downloading higher-dimensional Wikipedia articles. They were attempting to collapse vast multidimensional information fields into sequential English words.

Ra described coming from 6th density, where physical form was golden light, and using thought for interplanetary travel.

I imagine a 6th-density social memory complex – a unified consciousness containing millions of individuated awareness streams – trying to communicate with three humans in 1981 Connecticut using English grammar.

God bless! 👽 Good luck with that!

The miracle isn’t that the transmission is imperfect. The miracle is that anything meaningful gets through at all.

listen ➡

How Translation Actually Works in Channeling

Carla Rueckert spent years channeling consciously, using her free will to clothe telepathic concepts in her own language, before experiencing trance channeling where she moved herself into a higher dimensional space where she became unaware of time passing.

The process is not like Google Translator translating French into English. It’s more like:

— Higher-dimensional information exists as holographic gestalt—entire meaning-complexes present simultaneously
— The channel’s consciousness interfaces with this field (like tuning a radio)
— The resonance triggers felt knowing rather than conceptual understanding
— Channel’s linguistic mind scrambles to clothe this knowing in available vocabulary
— The result is a imperfect but functional bridge between dimensions

This is why channeled material often has that distinctive “mechanical” or s”tilted” flavor – it uses familiar words in slightly unfamiliar ways, creates new terms for concepts our language lacks, and frequently resorts to paradox and metaphor.

The language isn’t coming from higher dimensions.

The information is.

Language is what happens when that information gets force-fitted through the narrow bandwidth of human speech.

listen ➡

The Role of Liminal and Altered States
in understanding higher-dimensional information

Why do certain psychotropic substances, meditation, flow states, and dream states seem to facilitate higher-dimensional communication?

I think they do because they reduce the filtering of our conditioned brain/mind.

Aldous Huxley – who wrote “The Doors of Perception” a long time ago – said that normal waking consciousness operates like a “reduction valve,” filtering out the vast majority of information to let us function in 3D reality.

Download: The Doors of Perception

Psilocybin, DMT, deep meditation – can under the right circumstances temporarily open this valve.

Light codes are structured from symbols representing sacred geometry and showing rudimentary shapes of all ancient languages—created from light as “fire letters” used to create “words that build.”

I feel that ancient languages like Sanskrit, Egyptian hieroglyphs, or the oldest forms of the Hebrew alphabet, as well as Sumerian, Tibetan and Mayan glyphs carry faint residues of such transmission abilities in them.

I have been “reading” the “Keys of Enoch” book under the influence of magic mushrooms, and I was able to perfectly understand something that was previously incomprehensible.

Now I know that I was temporarily upgrading my “receiver hardware” – also known as brain-mind – to match the transmission frequency.

The sacred geometry in this transmitted text was not abstract – it became living mathematical structures I could perceive directly as energy lines and colors in elegant movement that transferred understanding in a direct way, much different from reading the actual text in the book.

The information was always there. My everyday state of mind and my conditioned brain neurology just filter it out.

~
~~
~

listen ➡

Part Four

Practical Portals for Accessing Higher-Dimensional Communication

The Dreamtime Interface

We all know about dreams, but usually in a very “dreamy” way. And mostly, we don’t give much serious attention to the huge amount of time we spend, literally – “out of time, out of mind.”

Anybody who has practiced lucid dreaming, or Tibetan Dream Yoga for a while or consciously spent extended time in the liminal space between dreaming and waking knows how rich and beneficial dreamtime can be.

And anthropologists know that traditional Aboriginal people spend their entire lives in Dreamtime. Their whole mythology is called The Dreaming.

Dreams operate in their own dimensional logic:

– Time isn’t linear.

– You can be in multiple places simultaneously.

– Impossible transformations occur naturally.

– And communication happens in ways that language can only crudely approximate upon waking.

This is why it is so hard to write down exactly, shortly after we fully wake up, what the most vivid dream contained.

Ever had a dream where you knew something profound but couldn’t articulate it when you woke? Happens to me all the time, and I know that that’s not memory failure – that’s the information existing in dream-dimensional architecture that has no direct translation into waking language.

The dream state may actually be closer to 5D and higher-dimensional communication than we realize.

Information arrives as complete gestalts, emotional tones carry meaning without words, and symbolic language operates with fluid multivalence rather than fixed definitions.

listen ➡

Meditation as Frequency Shift

3D-space-based intelligence is centered mostly in areas of the brain different from those related to speech.

When I enter deep meditation and my sense of body boundaries dissolves, when the “me” observing and the “space” being observed lose distinction, that actually indicates a dimensional shift in the architecture of consciousness.

The information available in that state operates under different rules. Knowing arises without an “I,” without a thinker/knower.

Even complex meaning is understood without concepts.

I am the communication rather than receiving it.

listen ➡

Flow States & Spontaneous “Gnosis”

Athletes call it “the zone.”

Artists call it “channeling the muse.”

Mystics call it “grace.”

The experience is that the separate self temporarily dissolves, and something else takes over—something that operates with effortless precision beyond what the ego-mind could coordinate.

That “something else” might be higher-dimensional aspects of your own consciousness temporarily freed from 3D filtering.

In those moments, you’re operating under different informational rules—accessing coherence, insights, and knowing that they don’t route through verbal thinking.

listen ➡

Heart-Centered Knowing

Multiple traditions emphasize the heart as the primary organ of higher communication, not metaphorically but literally.

The heart has its own neural network—a “heart brain” with 40,000 neurons. It generates the body’s strongest electromagnetic field, 5,000 times stronger than the brain’s. Ultra-sensitive equipment can measure that scientifically.

And it – the heart – responds to emotional/informational fields before the brain registers them consciously.

“Following your heart” isn’t just nice advice but an actual operational instruction for accessing nonlocal information fields. I see it like that, no doubt in my mind.

The felt sense of rightness, the intuitive knowing that arrives not as thought but as certainty – this might be what 5D+ communication actually feels like when it interfaces with the neural network of a human being.

~
~~
~

listen ➡

Synthesis

Language as Catalyst

Language as Bridge

So, if we return to my question, which language do we use in higher dimensions?

I would say that the answer is: we don’t use any.

But 3D/4D language can serve as a catalyst and bridge – not containing non-dual reality but creating conditions for direct recognition.

Language born in dualistic consciousness cannot capture non-dual reality. But it can:

— Point paradoxically (via paradox language, koans, poetry that uses words to transcend words)
— Create conditions of resonance (sacred texts, mantras, light codes that trigger activation)
— provisionally map the higher-dimensional territory (frameworks I use regularly in my metaphysical contemplations that orient consciousness toward what’s possible)
— Trigger direct recognition (moments reading these words when something clicks beyond logical comprehension)
The question is not really “how can we use dualistic language to describe nonduality?” but “how can language become transparent to what it cannot contain?”

Every mystical tradition discovered the same answer:

Stop trying to explain the alien territory. Instead, use maps that self-destruct upon arrival – burn after reading 😉

Use words that point so precisely at their own inadequacy that direct seeing becomes possible.

This is the ultimate paradox that I encountered it many times when writing about higher dimensions, realities beyond our scientific space-time concepts.

listen ➡

Maybe higher-dimensional communication is already happening constantly, but we mistake it for something else:

— Intuition
— Synchronicity
— “Gut feelings”
— Sudden insights that arrive fully formed
— The wordless understanding that passes between lovers
— The collective energy of a crowd becoming unified field
— The eerie knowing when someone’s staring at you
— The way music conveys emotion with zero spoken content

Maybe these aren’t paranormal anomalies but glimpses of our already built-in higher-dimensional communication capacity trying to express through the narrow bandwidth of 3D consciousness.

And maybe – just maybe – language itself is evolving, just as many channeled teachings have predicted over the last 70 years.

As collective human consciousness shifts, our words, syntax, and semantic structures might be gradually upgrading to better interface with multidimensional information.

My own experience of leaving behind the rather structured and rigid German language for the flexible bubble-gum speak of American English is just like that. I can enjoy using language in rather unconventional and free ways to express stream-of-consciousness communication.

Words becoming less fixed and more transparent to let Soul come though them in the spontaneous and unexpected ways of word-art or visual-art or sound-art …

The fact that we’re having this conversation – contemplating language beyond language, using words to point at what words cannot reach – might itself be evidence of dimensional bridge-building in progress.

The membrane between dimensions doesn’t thin through wishful thinking.

It thins through understanding the actual architecture of consciousness-information-vibration that constitutes reality at every level.

And then using that understanding to become, however briefly, transparent to what we truly are – (in my humble opinion ):

Awareness temporarily pretending to be separate, communication mistaking itself for things that need communicating, and unity playing the game of diversity.

I am sure that the language of higher dimensions isn’t something we need to learn. It is something we need to remember.

And every time silence becomes more true than speech, every time presence conveys more than words, and every time understanding arises without explanation – we’re already speaking higher-level language.

The real question is probably not what language we’ll use in 5D.

The really interesting and exciting question is:

What will become possible when we stop mistaking the map for the territory, the word for the thing, and the description for the direct knowing?

And maybe/hopefully we are about to find out.

I am totally for that!

Om Tat Sat

To be continued ….

listen ➡

post script:

Here are a few images of glyphs from ancient languages, some artistic interpretations of higher dimensional light language and sacred geometry as well as outer-worldly sounds that stir feelings and memories in me every time i watch them with an open mind …..

The less logical explanations there are of what it all is, the better.

Feel into your own system, maybe you find resonance.

Have fun!